top of page

Final negotiation in September 2022

  • 4월 23일
  • 2분 분량

After the campaign to expose the connection between the military and POSCO was conducted and the op-ed was published in March 2022, POSCO contacted the Clinic for negotiation in August 2022, days before the deadline to file appeal to the Supreme Court.


POSCO wanted "cease-fire" on POSCO's land taking as well as its relationship with the military, which implicitly includes the withdrawal of the lawsuit. In exchange, POSCO offered to "donate" a certain sum to a local representative organization in the benefit of plaintiffs for community development. To show its good faith, POSCO provided documentation of the past community development projects that it has contributed to (attached below) and also its settlement proposal for the plaintiffs.



Myanmar Gas Field Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Expansion Plan (Draft)
Myanmar Gas Field Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Expansion Plan (Draft)
  • Purpose: Expand the social responsibility projects for the villagers who have offered the land for the gas project and thereby create a mutually beneficial and cooperative relationship. 

  • Amount: US$1,000,000

  • Period: 2023-2024

  • Area: Kyaukphyu Township’s Gonchwein and Malakyuan: 2 villages

  • Project: 

not infrastructure development but supporting revenue regeneration for local communities (e.g., rice-making machines and other efficiency-raising farming machines)*  

formation of villager representative organization and selecting and supporting awarded projects through that organization

After US$ 1,000,000 is disbursed, the company (POSCO) will not interfere on the progress of the projects 

  • Schedule:

formation of villager representative organization and receiving project grant applications ~November 2022  

selecting awarded projects ~ December 2022

preparing for and obtaining government approval for projects  ~ March 2023

- Project period: April 2023 ~ December 2024 


The plaintiffs welcomed such offer but were concerned that, in the past community development projects, much of the companies' contribution suffered "leaks" as it made its way through the local government bureaucracy. Plaintiffs proposed one condition: they can supervise the spending of the funding. To that end, they held a series of meetings to organize themselves into an entity that can supervise the spending.


Plaintiffs held a series of meetings to elect a specific committee of local representatives who will monitor the spending of the settlement fund.
Plaintiffs held a series of meetings to elect a specific committee of local representatives who will monitor the spending of the settlement fund.

POSCO, however, did not accept such supervision until the last day of filing the appeal to the Supreme Court. The plaintiffs went ahead and filed the appeal, and the negotiation did not move forward.

On December 16, 2022, the Supreme Court announced its decision not to grant a certiorari on the case and the judgment in the appellate court was affirmed. The lawsuit imagined in December 2009 and filed in March 2016 finally ended.

 
 
logo_가로형_투명_w.png

Korea University Law School Clinical Legal Education Center

CJ Law Hall Room 102, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 02841

Office : +82-2-3290-1877

Prof. Kyungsin("KS") Park : kyungsinpark@korea.ac.kr

2025 All rights reserved

ⓒ 고려대학교 법학전문대학원 공익법률상담소 국제인권클리닉. Site designer MH.

bottom of page